🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," stated one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and fit for children," commented a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from the West, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations take a more measured stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of Australia and others indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.